With over 6000 Issue Summaries now online, chances are you may not have read the following Issue Summary: Spider-Man & X-Factor: Shadow Games # 2 So why not go read it now.
Joined: 07-Apr-2007
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1722
QuoteReplyTopic: Jean's genocide Posted: 14-Mar-2010 at 7:19pm
So. After having listened to the interview with the delightful Louise Simonson on the Uncanny X-Cast, I feel that I have to ask this question because I'm either a heartless twunt, or unaffected due to knowing what happened afterwards...
So, Jean, as Phoenix (as we were led to believe was the case at the time) flies off into space, eats a star and an entire race of people die.
As a result of this, Jim Shooter decided that because Phoenix is now genocidal, the only way that she could possibly be redeemed is through death.
On reading that issue, I, personally, didn't think it was such a big deal. I know, right? Pretty stupid. But then thinking about it, I don't know whether I just didn't think it was such a big deal for Jean's character because by the time I had read the Dark Phoenix saga, I already knew it wasn't really Jean. However, at the time, or for someone with no indepth knowledge of what happens in the future with Jean/Phoenix, does that particular act carry more resonance? I suppose what I'm asking is this; how did you guys feel, reading that issue? Did you think 'Oh god, she's a mass-murdering maniac'? Or, like I did 'Huh, I knew that was coming, but it's okay, because it's not really Jean'...?
Ever wish you could receive life advice from one of your favourite characters? Send an email to comicadvicecolumn@gmail.com and see whose sage counsel you receive!
I hate the idea that "it's not really Jean". It's the stupidest thing ever. Saying that takes every single ounce of drama out of the story. I think they've moved away from proclaiming that since then. The way I see it, the Phoenix needed Jean's body to heal, so she put it into a cocoon and made a copy body. She said she took her thoughts and her "soul", or something like that, right? It was the same Jean as always, an exact copy. Jean's original body gained back all the memories anyway. If it was the original Jean, she would have done the same thing. While it's a horrible thing to do, it's part of the character. She has to live with it.
I think genocide is the wrong term for it. Genocide is deliberate. Genocide implies an intent to destroy an entire group.
Phoenix had no intent to destroy the D'bari. She focused upon the sun b/c she was hungry and didn't know about the planet of inhabitants depending upon it. They had nothing to do with it and were just in the wrong place and the wrong time.
I read it as a tragedy, yes, but genocide or mass murder? No.
"The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks."
While it wasn't genocide as in intentionally killing an entire species, Phoenix was still to blame for their death and it can't be ruled out as a tragic accident. Sure, she consumed the star cause she was hungry, but she wasn't starving and she didn't have to neccesarily consume that star.
In the issue it clearly says that the star is about the size of the sun and has eleven planets circling around it.... which Phoenix must have seen traveling through space. She didn't bother to check if their was sentient life on any of them, and even if she had... she probably wouldn't have cared. She was about to ascend to godhood, not yet having unlimited power. To her, everyone else was like ants to the average human. She didn't bother to check or care. However, the D'Bari were a sentient life form with as much right to live as the human race.
Anyway, regardless how one classifies the D'Bari incident, in the same issue she clearly kills the entire crew of a Shi'Ar cruiser. She had already disabled the ship's engines and easily evaded their weapons.... she could have flown away, but she didn't. Their attack angered and annoyed her, and Phoenix lashed out. That was a clear act of multiple murders.
Going back to the initial question - whether the scenes shocked me or not - in a way they did. Not the D'Bari incident in itself, but all of the stages on Phoenix's way to darkness. The fury and anger in her when she fought Emma Frost, her tampering with the minds of Kitty's parents, and her cruel revenge on Mastermind.... when Dark Phoenix soared into space and did what she did, it was both liberating and scaring.
On the one hand it was so easy to relate to what Phoenix had gone through and having that much power just seemed awesome, but at the same time, one knew that they wouldn't want to be an unfortunate (and innocent) person ending up in her path. While the D'Bari incident in itself wasn't that shocking (maybe because they were just alien "asparagus" people), it's effect became so much bigger, when the Shi'Ar provided a voice for them. Before the calm in UXM #137, right before the trial of Phoenix, the reader didnÄt have a chance to slow down and think about the D'Bari. For me it only sank in by then.... 5 billion deaths!!
Actually, the trip through space took more out of the Phoenix than anticipated. She was starving (she did say she was "ravenous") and she couldn't go on until she'd eaten. Eating the star was an act of survival.
I don't think it's fair to say Phoenix murdered the Shi'ar, since that suggests absolving them of any responsibility. They attacked her first with the intent to kill her. She disabled them, read their minds, and saw that they wouldn't give up or leave her alone, which is then confirmed in the next panel where they say they're going to keep fighting "with honor."
Phoenix wouldn't have attacked them if they hadn't tried to kill her first. She was just more competent than they were.
Edited by Savant - 15-Mar-2010 at 12:06am
"The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks."
True, Phoenix hungered.... but the way how casually she decided to consume D'Bari ("this star should do nicely"), shows that she could have picked another star. She just didn't care, didn't bother to consider any consequences of her actions. Acting carelessly is no absolution of guilt, it just takes away intent, but not responsibility.
Regarding the Shi'Ar cruiser, they may have attacked her first, but that doesn't give Phoenix the right to kill them. Self-justice is illegal for a reason. Phoenix had already taken care of the immediate threat, she had disbabled the ship and could have avoided any further contact with ease, but chose not to. Murder is still murder, even if the victim is someone who has committed a crime or punishable act too.
Besides, it was a fully manned cruiser, and the decision to attack Phoenix had been made on the bridge by the captain. Many people aboard the ship didn't even know what hit them or why. Again, Phoenix didn't care - she slaughtered them all.
They're always saying that Phoenix has vast cosmic powers yet we've hardly seen them used to the full extent. So what if the Shi'ar wouldn't stop attacking her? She's Earth's most powerful telepath plus cosmic power. She could've brainwashed them, make herself undetectable, etc. Instead she took the easy way out.
I think her killing the D'Bari is worse than genocide. When humans commit genocide, ethnic groups are wiped out. When Phoenix committed genocide, an entire species was wiped out.
All very good points. In greater detail, here's how I see it.
Ignoring the retcon that Phoenix wasn't Jean, she should have been held accountable for all those deaths. True enough, she wasn't in her right frame of mind, being overwhelmed by near limitless power, but at the same time, she was aware of what she was doing, and potential implications of her actions. I would argue that at the level of power she was at, there is no way that a telepath of that magnitude would be entirely unaware of a densely populated planet. She would have sensed something, at least an inkling of sentient life from the star system, and whilst the journey through space would have made her ravenous, travelling far enough into Shi'ar protected space, she could have easily found another star that didn't have populated planets depending upon it.
Her attack on the Shi'ar cruiser is almost incidental at this point other than to force the Shi'ar to action against Jean, a former ally. Jean is clearly beyond drunk on power at this point and so therefore sees the Shi'ar's attack on her as an attack on a god--which she truly seems to believe herself to be at this juncture. She reacted like many of the gods of myth when faced with opposition-- with extreme prejudice and reducing them to ashes. Again, furthering my point that she could have easily sensed the life forms on the planet she had just destroyed, is that she was able to pluck the thoughts of the crew out of their minds and knew they would keep attacking her. She HAD to know that D'Bari was populated and the damage that her consumption of the star would cause.
So, on one hand, Jean wantonly murdered 5 billion people, and as such, the Shi'ar, Kree and Skrulls kind of had a point when they wanted her blood. Her subsequent sacrifice to save the rest of the X-Men, whilst noble, does NOT erase this deed or go anyway to balance the scales, although I suppose it could be seen by the Shi'ar that justice had been done-- a killer has been brought to justice.
On the other hand... are more fingers. As well as the retcon that Phoenix was a facsimile of Jean Grey that took her place, and was experiencing human emotion for the first time. Lets face it, we're a pretty emotional race, as it goes. There are times when the smallest things can make us happy, sad, angry... and these are strong emotions, all of which a being of limitless power is experiencing for the first time, and not through the traditional growing up, having a childhood, learning right from wrong... but through experiencing life as a female in her early twenties. Absolutely no emotion whatsoever for millenia... then BOOM. Emotion-town. Population; Phoenix. Firstly, she's dealing with the fact that she is experiencing love for the first time, via Scott, who clearly loves Jean too. Then she is subtely manipulated into having conflicting emotions on this scale, between Cyclops and Mastermind. She is coerced into attacking her friends (whom Jean sees as family, a different aspect of love), then released. She experiences furious rage aimed at Emma Frost and Mastemind for their torture of her friends and the mind-games played on her, respectively. She experiences fear and distrust from those around her, including people she feels love for, by her growing power levels and the casual way she will alter other people's memories and opinions, and that she will use more force than necessary on the Hellfire Club goons who were driving after Kitty. She feels betrayed when her friends attack her and try to stop her. All of these massive emotional flip-flops after experiencing nothing by way of an emotion for millenia? It's enough to drive anyone mad, I'd imagine, especially when you're a being of such power that you can not only do something about it, but you can literally do almost anything to change it. Not only is the temptation there, but there is motive, and considering that was all Phoenix had experienced of life as a human was emotional turmoil, being a copy of Jean Grey notwithstanding, its akin to the difference between reading or hearing about something secondhand and experiencing it for yourself. For example, I could read in graphic detail about how much it would hurt to get shot in the guts, but until it happened to me for real, I would never truly know how it felt.
All of these factors were a LOT for Phoenix to reconcile, and even with Jean Grey's basic personality, memories, and presumably moral compass to guide it, Phoenix couldn't handle being fully human and flipped out. She needed more energy to convert herself into a god-like state, and so did what Phoenix knew to do-- eat a star and gain more power. The fact that the star was populated was of little consequence to a crazed cosmic force, and whether she knew or not, she devoured the star. Perhaps this makes the motives more understandable, but it certainly does not excuse Phoenix's actions, however nor does it lay any blame at the feet of the real Jean.
Ever wish you could receive life advice from one of your favourite characters? Send an email to comicadvicecolumn@gmail.com and see whose sage counsel you receive!
Some interesting points Boots. I think that your explanation about the Phoenix experiencing emotions for the first time is one of the better reasons for accepting the Jean in cocoon retcon and for ignoring the later semi-attempt to undo that retcon. Jean had two decades of emotional experience and I don't think would have freaked like the Phoenix did. It was the Phoenix's inexperience with the sway of human frailties that made her transformation and fall believable.
However, I would suggest that folks blaming Phoenix for the D'Bari deaths are overlooking a couple of things. First, she wasn't all powerful at the time. In fact, she was ravenous and couldn't (according to the text of the issue) go on without food. So one simply can't assume that she could have found another, more suitable star to satiate her hunger and restore her power. And I think it would be entirely possible that she wasn't capable of picking up the existence of the species telepathically because of her weakness. In fact, it seems to me that the reading should be the opposite - she was weak and starving, she found a suitable meal nearby and she grabbed it for self-preservation. It's not murder or homicide anymore, it's manslaughter at worst (and the level of negligence would be debatable).
Also, one has to remember that Phoenix isn't human. Phoenix is far above human, as far as we are above, say, insects. I don't stop and think about the black widow spiders killed by the exterminator I called. I don't mourn the dead spiders. I don't feel bad that I'm choosing my safety and that of my family and pets over their survival. One simply can't expect Phoenix to care all that much about a similarly inferior species. Is that unfortunate and tragic? Is it harder to wrestle with ethically b/c they are sentient rather than insect? Sure it is, but that doesn't change the fact that the difference between the Phoenix and the D'Bari is huge and that a vastly superior creature is unlikely to care about the well-being of a vastly inferior species. And that's sort of the problem with trying to describe what the Phoenix did in human terms like murder or even genocide or manslaughter. Those are terms based upon what a reasonable person can and should choose but Phoenix isn't a person at all and her actions are far beyond what any human could comprehend, which is sort of the point of the story.
Criticizing Phoenix's behavior is more like blaming the omniscient, omnipotent Christian God for the recent destruction in Haiti b/c He allowed it to be (or even caused it, depending upon one's theological views of God's power, since many Christian faiths attribute the weather to a display of God's control).
And I don't think that Phoenix just wantonly destroyed the Shi'ar ship. If she was really lashing out she would have destroyed them instantly but she didn't. Instead, she disabled them first, they were well enough to run away if they had chosen to do so (40% fields and all) and she read their minds. Reading their minds told her that they weren't going to give up until someone was dead. Her killing them is self-defense, quite legal and capable of passing the "legal provocation" standard, if one wants to default to legal speech.
Edited by Savant - 15-Mar-2010 at 5:24am
"The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks."
I think it's difficult to see Phoenix (as a separate entity to Jean) as not being responsible for the D'Bari deaths. Her actions directly led to the destruction of an entire race, however I can see your point about her deeming herself so far beyond them that she wouldn't mourn for them.
However, with this being a retcon, and getting myself back on track (since I seem to have derailed myself, which is an achievment in and of itself, really)... in the original, intended context, ie: Phoenix was Jean, no two ways about it, and that she was simply shown the full extension of her abilities... was Shooter right to say that, at that time, the character of Jean was irrideemable in terms of having killed the D'Bari, and that she should be shown to suffer the consequences of her actions, by way of being killed off? To reiterate-- Jean as a mutant of considerable power and NOT as a cosmic entity masquerading as Jean, killing an entire planet of sentient life forms due to her being drunk on power... is that something that the character would, or even SHOULD have been able to come back from?
Ever wish you could receive life advice from one of your favourite characters? Send an email to comicadvicecolumn@gmail.com and see whose sage counsel you receive!
I don't disagree that Phoenix/Jean wouldn't be, in some manner, responsible for the D'Bari deaths. I just disagree with the notion that she was responsible b/c she was "drunk on power." Responsible is an awfully vague term. If she needed the star to survive, b/c she'd used too much power and her power was still finite and she needed to eat to survive, that is a very different situation and one that certainly impacts whether the character is or is not redeemable. Negligence and self-defense are very different from intent to commit genocide or murder. I would find Phoenix more redeemable than those who have intentionally committed murder and other similar acts and are today apparently redeemed - Emma, Magneto being the obvious two. Shooter's comment seems more a product of its time and certainly doesn't reflect later stories.
But let's take a step back a moment and question why the D'Bari matter. What makes them the equivalent to human beings worth of valuation, which seems to be the basic assumption in much of the condemnation of the Phoenix's behavior. Is it b/c they are sentient? Cognitive scientists wrestle even today with trying to define what that is. Is it b/c they have families? Ants and insects and many species that we kill without a second thought have families. Is it b/c they feel pain? According to Peter Singer and other animal rights activists, lots of creatures feel pain, making any of us meat eaters guilty of mass-murder. If Phoenix is irredeemable for their deaths, does that mean we're not redeemable too?
But then, I'm not convinced that Phoenix would be mentally competent to stand a trial, which is another concern. If she's not competent, then again, she wouldn't truly be 'responsible.'
And if one accepts PL's argument that someone who attempts to kill someone else shouldn't automatically be killed in punishment, then that same logic should apply to the Phoenix as well.
Edited by Savant - 15-Mar-2010 at 7:16am
"The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks."
I don't know if there are any people in this discussion that read Dark Phoenix as it came out, but I did, and even though I was very young at the time, I remember thinking as she killed the Shi'Ar and destroyed the D'Bari: "Oh my GOD! She can never come back from this! She's gone insane!"
Two thoughts: One that it was irredeemably evil, the other that she was insane. That was my whole thing back then: was she responsible, even though she was crazy, driven crazy by Mastermind and her powers?
I re-read that story a gazillion times, before X-Factor #1, and so I finally came to a conclusion: She (Jean, I thought) WAS responsible. In my mind it became like "Driving Drunk". She was clearly not in full control of her faculties, but at the same time she should have retained some morallity, some knowledge of right and wrong. In the end, she made her choice, committing suicide rather then loosing control again, because she knew she couldn't control herself. She was too weak to control the power, so she killed herself before she had to make that choice once again (and fail aqgain).
I accepted that Jean had to die back then, and the story was all the better for it. Doesn't mean I didn't cry when I read it....
"Professor Xavier is a Jerk!" - Kitty
"I'm Dark! I'm Goth as Hell!" - Pixie
"Kurt who?" - Hope
"MONOLITH WAS RIGHT!!!!"
"Meet the New Boss, Same as the old Boss" - Pete Townsend
not to co-mingle topics as I believe someone brought it up in the Wanda thread anyway - but it is a little similar the way these two very powerful characters were driven insane and committed heinous acts, and in Jean's case was absolved thru retcon that it wasn't her, and Wanda is still awaiting her absolution (that is, if she even gets it). And Jean/Phoenix/Whateve killed a solar system, where as Wanda killed maybe tens of people (I would count those who died because of powerloss like Magma's boyfriend), and even ressurected one of the people she killed, twice.
In Jean's retcon, they obviously wanted to get her as far away from the crime as possible, so they made it a completely separate entity and I'm not sure even how often it was brought up in those early years.
"Besides, life's no fun...without any risks." - Betsy Braddock, Uncanny X-Men (v1) #256
I think I've come to several decisions factoring in every possible case.
1) Phoenix was really Jean and she was driven to insanity due to the manipulations played on her by Mastermind combined with her massive power boost-- Not guilty. If anything, Mastermind should have been the one to face the Shi'ar for breaking her psyche and causing the insanity that was entirely out of character for her at that point in time.
2) Phoenix was a cosmic entity that replaced Jean and was driven mad by her exposure to raw human emotions and Mastermind's manipulations--JEAN is not culpable at all. If anything, Phoenix is doubly to blame for masquerading as Jean (Identity theft/ fraud), and everyone who messed with her head is also to blame for driving her mad. Ultimately, Phoenix, as a millenia-old cosmic force is still to blame for the deaths of the D'Bari, was aware of the consequences of its actions, and should be held accountable.
3) It was Jean all along, and whilst she was temporarily a bit messed up in the head, her actions were derived essentially from her wanting to push her limits and see what she was actually capable of with her new found power-- Probably the biggest stretch since the retcon, but if this had been the case, then she does indeed deserve to be lasered into annihilation. Just because she had the power at her disposal to do such a thing, doesn't mean she needs to prove that she can. It would be akin to Psylocke ACTUALLY shattering a mountain just to prove that she can back up her outrageous claims with something substantial.
Ever wish you could receive life advice from one of your favourite characters? Send an email to comicadvicecolumn@gmail.com and see whose sage counsel you receive!
For all we know the D'Bari were secretly building a doomsday device to destroy all other life in the galaxy, and the Phoenix saved everyone. She's a hero.
Hmm... so I'm the one saying don't execute the mentally ill and JanO is the one saying fry her? I may need to change my forum sig JanO
Maybe, but that's not what I'm saying. The feelings and attitude's I held towards the story have to be filtered to end up with a little, 10-year old JanO. In the end, I decided that, had Jean really been Phoenix at the time, she WAS responsible as she was more of a drunk driver than an actually insane person. It happened, and it was her.
So basically I'm calling for the "execution"/extreme punishment of drunk drivers, which I am fine with....
"Professor Xavier is a Jerk!" - Kitty
"I'm Dark! I'm Goth as Hell!" - Pixie
"Kurt who?" - Hope
"MONOLITH WAS RIGHT!!!!"
"Meet the New Boss, Same as the old Boss" - Pete Townsend
I was a youngster also and I did not at the time have a real good sense of what genocide was. I did know that Dark Phoenix was way more powerful than anyone could handle and that things were looking real bad. When "Jean" sacrificed herself in issue #137 it was epic. There weren't very many comic fans around then, so I was alone in my AWE. A lot has changed since then. I remember after they "redid" the Phoenix so Jean could come back that the return story was fesible and it did not bother me. I was just glad she was back. Still waiting on her next return. She is a great character.
Going back to something savant asked (and hopefully not getting too much off-topic here)...
But let's take a step back a moment and question why the D'Bari matter. What makes them the equivalent to human beings worth of valuation, which seems to be the basic assumption in much of the condemnation of the Phoenix's behavior. Is it b/c they are sentient? Cognitive scientists wrestle even today with trying to define what that is. Is it b/c they have families? Ants and insects and many species that we kill without a second thought have families. Is it b/c they feel pain? According to Peter Singer and other animal rights activists, lots of creatures feel pain, making any of us meat eaters guilty of mass-murder. If Phoenix is irredeemable for their deaths, does that mean we're not redeemable too?
Peter Singer has a very extreme view on the issue. I think (and many of Singer's less extreme colleagues agree) that "ability" and "right" go hand in hand. Meaning, the ability to feel pain also includes the right to not be made feel pain. That's why animals that are being processed into food are exposed to as little pain as possible. They are killed in a "painless" way, whereas animal cruelty is illegal and gets punished in many nations.
The right not to be killed, though, is based on the ability to comprehend what being killed means. Most animals don't even have concepts of past and future (as far as is known), so there goes that. Now, one could argue that a newborn human baby also doesn't have those concepts, but they have the potential to have them, which philosphically is considered the same/similar.
Which brings me back to the D'Bari - they looked like asparagus people, but they were an advanced society capable of space travel nonetheless. That was even known back then, as one D'Bari visited Earth way back in Avengers (1st series) #4. They are a functioning society, not only able to feel pain to understand their own mortality and be afraid of dying - hence killing them for no apparent reason other than that one can is wrong.
As for Jean needing the sun to survive - it never said that. TTrue she is hungry and ravenous - but that's an appetite. She doesn't look weak or drained, she has no troubles to barely reach the sun before she dies... it's just that she had run "out of gas". She had these near infinite powers and used them to transport herself through the galaxy. Then she says "I can't go on", meaning she could have just taken a break on a planet, eaten, waited for her powers to regenerate. But she didn't do that - it was easier to steal someone else's gas - and she didn't care whether someone else needed that gas to keep them alive. Possibly she couldn't care in the state she was in, but she was far from not being able to survive without that sun. If it were, that sure would have been brought up to her defense in the trial.
I agree that just because Phoenix had caused the deaths of so many people, she shouldn't automatically be killed as punishment. However, some punishment was needed... and the problem was that there was probably no way to keep her contained in a prison or re-education center against her will. In the end, she needed to die, because she was a danger to all of creation or rather all those that she hadn't killed yet, and not to avenge those people that already had become her victims.
For all we know the D'Bari were secretly building a doomsday device to destroy all other life in the galaxy, and the Phoenix saved everyone. She's a hero.
Damn those celery people and their demon ways!
Aside from that - in reading this thread, I'm inclined to agree with the Shi'ar in blaming the Phoenix. Now granted they also happen to want to destroy anyone who has hosted, or could potentially host, the Phoenix, but then again - it did destroy an ENTIRE solar system. Was it ever stated if any of the other planets orbiting that star had life? I'm assuming not as they are SO focused on those plotting celery people.....
The Shi'ar are a little extreme, but put in real life context, imagine if someone destroyed one of the States (let's say....Maryland so as not to upset anyone as I reside there) killing all those who lived there. How would the rest of the country react? We'd probably bomb the shiz out of the culprits....
"Besides, life's no fun...without any risks." - Betsy Braddock, Uncanny X-Men (v1) #256
The point in Shooter's decision to have Phoenix die was also that he wanted her to be "redeemed", not just punished. In some way, we still had to feel for Jean, and in her sacrefice she became once again "heroic", taking responsibility for what she had done, and what she would have done again.
"Professor Xavier is a Jerk!" - Kitty
"I'm Dark! I'm Goth as Hell!" - Pixie
"Kurt who?" - Hope
"MONOLITH WAS RIGHT!!!!"
"Meet the New Boss, Same as the old Boss" - Pete Townsend
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This is an unofficial fan site. It is not sponsored, licensed, or approved by Marvel Characters, Inc. To go to the official "Marvel Comics" site, click [here]. "X-Men" is a registered trademark of Marvel Characters, Inc.