spacer RANDOM ISSUE Summaries
With over 6000 Issue Summaries now online, chances are you may not have read the following Issue Summary:

New X-Men Annual 2001

So why not go read it now.




comic related fun



Runaways



  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

Are alt-characters genetically identical?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Wolfthomas View Drop Down
Member
Member
Avatar

Joined: 18-May-2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 446
  Quote Wolfthomas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Are alt-characters genetically identical?
    Posted: 19-Jul-2010 at 3:15pm
So my question is are characters from another universe genetically the same as the counterparts on 616? Say 616 Captain America and Ultimate Cap?

I got thinking about this when discussing Nate Grey, I'd assumed he was identical on a genetic level to Cable, while others stated he was more like a brother. That discussion aside, it got me thinking about this above question.

Now I know some characters like 616 and Ultimate Red Skull would obviously be different, but other such as Havok must of been identical to his Mutant-X counterpart otherwise Reed Richards certainly would have picked up on it.

I guess it's probably a combination of quantum mechanics and whatever a writer wants.
Back to Top
Spectral Knight View Drop Down
Member
Member
Avatar

Joined: 15-Apr-2007
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 488
  Quote Spectral Knight Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19-Jul-2010 at 4:21pm
Does it depend on the branching point and how it branches from 616. Like Ultimate, while an alternate reality, doesn't seem to have a direct 'jumping off' point from 616, where as something like AoA had the clear branch point of Xavier dying in Israel.

X-Man isn't strictly an alt of Cable, is he? Thought he was more an equivelent. I guess he wouldn't be genetically the same as Cable, but certainly genetically similar. 'Brothers' would be an apt term, as even with identical parentage, you can still have different genetic traits. Where as AoA Wolverine and 616 Wolverine would genetically be the same, I'm guessing since the timeline branched off after his birth.
Back to Top
sleezoid View Drop Down
Member
Member
Avatar

Joined: 07-Nov-2007
Location: Massachusetts
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 235
  Quote sleezoid Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19-Jul-2010 at 5:08pm
I was reading Uncanny house of M recently and a male Psylocke from another realities' powers didn't work on Captain Britain. I don't know if that helps?
Be excellent to each other.
Back to Top
EphemeristX View Drop Down
Member
Member
Avatar

Joined: 09-Apr-2007
Location: Sol III
Online Status: Online
Posts: 973
  Quote EphemeristX Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19-Jul-2010 at 5:11pm
Cable is supposedly the anomaly and Nate Grey is the constant, if that helps.  
Back to Top
Cable View Drop Down
Member
Member
Avatar

Joined: 07-Apr-2007
Location: PA, USA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 852
  Quote Cable Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19-Jul-2010 at 5:27pm
Oddly enough the answer seems to be sometimes they are, sometimes they aren't.


Back to Top
asterix2x View Drop Down
Member
Member
Avatar

Joined: 08-Apr-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 32
  Quote asterix2x Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19-Jul-2010 at 6:08pm
Some of the Ultimate characters have differences, I remember Dazzler having black hair, though she was kinda goth and there's a chance it's caused by chemicals (dye). Bishop, Caliban and Callisto have different powers from their main counterparts. Hell, Cable isn't even Cable there. Dazzler powers resemble Jubilee's, Pyro creates fire and not just manipulate it, etc....

The silliest one is that Liz Iforgotherlasname is not just Firestar, but she's the daughter of Blob too. Not sure if it can be considered a genetic difference, but their ages differ from yhe original versions too. Iceman, Shadowcat and Jubilee are close in age there and Marrow appeared as a teenager. Bishop was born 50 years early here.

I don't approve physical and genetic differences between alternative versions of characters, it feels like a cheap way of doing something new with them. Alternative versions should bring in new and different personalities, not new and different people.
I'm a loser baby....so,yes....please......i beg you to kill me.....
Back to Top
Peter Luzifer View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 19-Jan-2007
Location: Germany
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1564
  Quote Peter Luzifer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19-Jul-2010 at 6:10pm
Alternate reality scenarios don't have and defined rules.
 
Usually, the same people would have the same genetic make-up.... except when they don't. (Male Psylocke)
 
However, X-Man and Cable were never meant to be the same person. One is the naturally born and conceived child of Scott Summers and Madelyne Pryor, the other a genetically engineered offspring of Scott Summers and Jean Grey.
 
While Maddie and Jean are genetically identical, the children were created a different times and quite probably from different sperms and eggs.... hence they may be alike, but they are not genetically the same. Just like your average brothers.
 
Back to Top
QDLux29 View Drop Down
Member
Member
Avatar

Joined: 31-Mar-2009
Location: MD/DC, USA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 440
  Quote QDLux29 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19-Jul-2010 at 6:15pm
Not to beat the dead horse, but they also aren't genetically identical as Madelyne is Cable's mother, while Jean is Nathan's, and I don't think AOA Sinister knew what exact genes went together in Cable's natural birth to duplicate in Nate's test tube. (EDIT: Peter beat me to it...)

Another odd example (unfortunately also dealing with a Time Travel baby), is Rachel as she has been stated numerous times to be a mutliversal (is that a word?) anomoly being the ONLY Rachel in the multiverse, but has appeared in other timelines/realities. Now it could be argued that each one is uniquely different and not exactly the same, but for the purposes of each story, it is the same character, and would probably be on the same lines as Cable/Nathan as they are genetically similar, but not exact.

However, I would venture to say that characters not having strict exceptions like the two previously mentioned, are probably very much genetically identical (ie Cyclops, Storm, Jean, etc. in 616, AOA, Ultimate, etc.)

Edited by QDLux29 - 19-Jul-2010 at 6:16pm
"Besides, life's no fun...without any risks." - Betsy Braddock, Uncanny X-Men (v1) #256

http://shouldahadav8.tumblr.com/
Back to Top
Wolfthomas View Drop Down
Member
Member
Avatar

Joined: 18-May-2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 446
  Quote Wolfthomas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-Jul-2010 at 6:27am
Logically and statistically Nate Grey and Cable should just be sibblings, I will admit that. But stuff in comics never seems to make logical sense, for example why does Cable and Nate's telepathy cause interference? Cable never caused interference with Rachel Grey, or even his clone Stryfe. Also an age regressed Cable looks uncannily like Nate Grey.

Had both births occured in the same universes I'd say it was unlikely they were indentical, but they occured in different universes. So we might have gotten a situation like Alex Summers significantly different worlds, but identical person.

At this moment the only way to be sure I believe is an outright statement in a comic that proves it either way. I like the idea that they're very similar (possibly the same) and it's a whole nature versus nurture situation.


Edited by Wolfthomas - 20-Jul-2010 at 6:35am
Back to Top
Spectral Knight View Drop Down
Member
Member
Avatar

Joined: 15-Apr-2007
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 488
  Quote Spectral Knight Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-Jul-2010 at 8:49am
I think the age regression visual similarity does't mean anything. When I was much younger, I looked like a younger version of my brother (who now looks quite different from me). It's more an in-reference that he looks like Nate when he's younger. The strange thing is, visually in some Cable flashbacks, he's got the Nate white streak and in others, he's just completely brown haired.
Back to Top
Providence View Drop Down
Member
Member
Avatar

Joined: 07-Jul-2007
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 543
  Quote Providence Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-Jul-2010 at 1:53pm
Also in Exiles, the counterpart for Mariko Yashida was a mutant called Sunfire and had the same powers as her cousin.
Back to Top
Monolith View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 20-Feb-2007
Online Status: Online
Posts: 2629
  Quote Monolith Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-Jul-2010 at 2:43pm
Swordsman II of the Gatherers was the alternate counterpart and physical and genetic duplicate of the original Swordsman of our Earth...even though one was Jacques Duquesne and the other was Philip Jarvert, and one was at least a decade younger than the other.
 
So...yeah.
Charisma: the fine line between winning them over with charm and ruling them by fear.
Back to Top
Tyler5618 View Drop Down
Member
Member
Avatar

Joined: 05-Jul-2007
Location: New York
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1132
  Quote Tyler5618 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-Jul-2010 at 9:08pm
So Beast and Dark Beast... same genes, yes?
"So long as I remain true to myself, I see no reason to apologize for how I appear to others."
- Storm, Uncanny X-Men #246
Back to Top
Peacock1976 View Drop Down
Member
Member
Avatar

Joined: 15-Jul-2009
Location: Netherlands
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 21
  Quote Peacock1976 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-Jul-2010 at 10:24pm
Then there are people like Juggernaut:
in our dimension (616) he received his powers from the Cyttorak-gem, but in some alt. universes he is portraited a mutant.
And in no way connected to prof X. whatsoever.
Back to Top
QDLux29 View Drop Down
Member
Member
Avatar

Joined: 31-Mar-2009
Location: MD/DC, USA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 440
  Quote QDLux29 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-Jul-2010 at 1:31pm
Originally posted by chrissstopher

So Beast and Dark Beast... same genes, yes?


I would say yes....except IIRC DB performed experiments on himself, so his genetic structure could be different from 616 Beast.
"Besides, life's no fun...without any risks." - Betsy Braddock, Uncanny X-Men (v1) #256

http://shouldahadav8.tumblr.com/
Back to Top
Peter Luzifer View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 19-Jan-2007
Location: Germany
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1564
  Quote Peter Luzifer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-Jul-2010 at 3:12pm
Originally posted by Wolfthomas

Logically and statistically Nate Grey and Cable should just be sibblings, I will admit that. But stuff in comics never seems to make logical sense, for example why does Cable and Nate's telepathy cause interference? Cable never caused interference with Rachel Grey, or even his clone Stryfe. Also an age regressed Cable looks uncannily like Nate Grey.
That doesn't prove anything. Two walkie-talkies might cause interference with each other, simply because they operate on a similar frequency, whereas a third walkie-talkie might not be affected... despite it being manufactured by the same company.
Back to Top
Wolfthomas View Drop Down
Member
Member
Avatar

Joined: 18-May-2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 446
  Quote Wolfthomas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Jul-2010 at 5:45am
Originally posted by Peter Luzifer

That doesn't prove anything. Two walkie-talkies might cause interference with each other, simply because they operate on a similar frequency, whereas a third walkie-talkie might not be affected... despite it being manufactured by the same company.

Psychics aren't radios...

But fair enough, how about some hard evidence then?

http://img189.imageshack.us/img189/2156/cablea.jpg

That's from Cable #31 where he fights (and beats) Nate Grey. It's from the omnisicent narrator's point of view, so I say that's largely objective. Unless someone can show me otherwise, it's what I am going to believe.

Also in Cable #30, Cable states Nate Grey shares an identical psychic signature and "bio-signature" (which I assume is a fancy word for DNA). When both came within the same area, they experienced each others life/memories instantanesly in a bunch of flashbacks. Also Nate Grey sees a picture of Cable and is confused, stating the picture is him but older, another point towards how similar they're meant to look.

Finally when the two of them make psychic contact this happens:

http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/3668/cablef.jpg

Even during the whole following fight Nate accepts they're the same person (in fact it's one of the reasons he's pissed off).

So yeah...


Edited by Wolfthomas - 22-Jul-2010 at 7:05am
Back to Top
Blackcyclops View Drop Down
Member
Member
Avatar

Joined: 13-Apr-2007
Location: Chi-Town
Online Status: Online
Posts: 7317
  Quote Blackcyclops Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Jul-2010 at 5:53am
Bio-signature isn't the same thing as DNA...bio-sig is the energy signature that all living things emit...
"And someone's mom wants to eat all their souls. As a mom, I was offended. Moms should get to be role models, too."-Savant
Back to Top
Wolfthomas View Drop Down
Member
Member
Avatar

Joined: 18-May-2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 446
  Quote Wolfthomas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Jul-2010 at 6:59am
Originally posted by Blackcyclops

Bio-signature isn't the same thing as DNA...bio-sig is the energy signature that all living things emit...
  Cool thanks, but whatever it is, it is identical.


Edited by Wolfthomas - 22-Jul-2010 at 7:00am
Back to Top
Peter Luzifer View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 19-Jan-2007
Location: Germany
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1564
  Quote Peter Luzifer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Jul-2010 at 7:44am
So, if you have already chosen which one's the only answer you'd be willing to accept, why did you ask your question in the first place?
Back to Top
Wolfthomas View Drop Down
Member
Member
Avatar

Joined: 18-May-2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 446
  Quote Wolfthomas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Jul-2010 at 7:52am
Originally posted by Peter Luzifer

So, if you have already chosen which one's the only answer you'd be willing to accept, why did you ask your question in the first place?


Well, when I asked my question, I hadn't read those comics in a really long time, the debate caused me to research the answer. But I wasn't just asking about Nate Grey/Cable, I was asking about every Alt, people like 616 Cap and Ulitmate Cap.

At this moment the only answer I'm willing to accept is the one with sufficient evidence, in those comics Marvel has stated they're identical, I will happily accept a more recent comic that says otherwise/retcons this.


Edited by Wolfthomas - 22-Jul-2010 at 8:19am
Back to Top
Monolith View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 20-Feb-2007
Online Status: Online
Posts: 2629
  Quote Monolith Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Jul-2010 at 12:08pm
Those same comics you're citing also said Nate's power signature was identical to Dark Phoenix. I think there's room for interpretation.
Charisma: the fine line between winning them over with charm and ruling them by fear.
Back to Top
Wolfthomas View Drop Down
Member
Member
Avatar

Joined: 18-May-2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 446
  Quote Wolfthomas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Jul-2010 at 12:39pm
Originally posted by Monolith

Those same comics you're citing also said Nate's power signature was identical to Dark Phoenix. I think there's room for interpretation.


Fair enough, I must of missed that, I'll have a look now. By the way who said that in the comic? Because it's important if it's a character or the narrator.

Edit: Okay so I read through Cable #29, Moira does not say his power signature is identical, she says "it equals the most uncontainable psionic energy we have on record -- The Phoenix". That statement is a indicator of how powerful Nate Grey is, not of similarity.

But that issue does give us this gem:

http://img833.imageshack.us/img833/5644/cable1.jpg

Straight up evidence that Moira tested them and found them genetically identical.

Now at the risk of being arrogant, I'd like to say the onus is on anyone who disagrees with this to provide evidence to the contrary.

I'm also sorry it degraded into this argument, I was more interested if Exiles Mimic was the same as 616 Mimic etc...


Edited by Wolfthomas - 22-Jul-2010 at 5:04pm
Back to Top
grief View Drop Down
Member
Member
Avatar

Joined: 08-Apr-2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1048
  Quote grief Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27-Jul-2010 at 1:26am
Originally posted by Wolfthomas


I'm also sorry it degraded into this argument, I was more interested if Exiles Mimic was the same as 616 Mimic etc...


lol

Then why not just ask THAT?

It really does depend on the writer though. Some characters are practically the same while others are totally and absolutely different. There is no one constant rule for all alternate reality characters.

Take Heather Hudson from Exiles - while yes, she was that realities Heather Hudson, she was also black. And a sasquatch. Which is REALLY different from the 616 Heather Hudson and, given that she has a different skin tone, would imply that the two are genetically different.

I've always belived that X-Man and Cable are essentially just the same person. While it's a one in a million shot that Sinister grabbed just the right DNA from Cyclops and Jean in the AoA to create Nate, he did. And he did because Marvel wanted X-Man to be the AoA's Cable. We need to keep in mind that Nate Grey wasn't created genetically, he was created as a character and a plot device - one that is exactly indentical to Cable.
Winner of Best 617 Hero for 2007 - Magneto (Magneto Cado Rex)

First (and only?) winner of Story of the Month for August 09 - misseDirections #3
Back to Top
Monolith View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 20-Feb-2007
Online Status: Online
Posts: 2629
  Quote Monolith Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27-Jul-2010 at 2:09am
Exiles Heather may not have been the same Heather AT ALL. It depends on how many errors you think Marvel is capable of.
 
In her origins she was called Heather McDaniel Hudson, not Heather MacNeil Hudson. There was also a redheaded woman wearing a green and yellow costume similar to our Vindicator in flashbacks to Exiles-Heather's Alpha Flight. So Heather McDaniel and Heather MacNeil may've been two different people on her Earth.
 
OR...
 
Maybe Marvel goofed and called her the wrong "Mc"Name. Maybe that "Vindicator" seen in one panel was a miscolored Aurora (kinda looked like her style more than Heather's). Call it like you see it.
Charisma: the fine line between winning them over with charm and ruling them by fear.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



Home |UXN Main | Issue Information | Cerebro Files | United We Stand | X-Universe | Merging Minds | News Archive | Multimedia | Collecting | Site Map | Forum

This is an unofficial fan site. It is not sponsored, licensed, or approved by Marvel Characters, Inc. To go to the official "Marvel Comics" site, click [here]. "X-Men" is a registered trademark of Marvel Characters, Inc.

All original content Copyright © 2000-2013 UncannyXmen.Net.