| Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
UncannyScott
Member
Joined: 08-Apr-2007
Location: California
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2700
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 22-Jul-2011 at 8:21pm |
|
That is so true Crute lol. Wolverine pretty much just walks into every blast and shot now, even though they've gone on record within stories him referring to the fact that even though he heals every blow and cut and such hurts like hell. The factor doesn't dull the initial pain. So he's like a masochist now or something lol. But yeah, Superman's problems are mostly fixed with his huge array of powers that either grow or shrink a bit given the writer. Hell the man had a super powered brain at one point in the Golden Age.
So now at the new 52 panel from today...things like Superman's Death and Coast City destruction and Rebirth all happened. So all this stuff happened but like Spider-Man (but on a bigger scale) we'er just supposed to assume that certain things were altered. The only problem with that is that the TPB's of these stories still have the old version. So in this new world Doomsday still killed Supes but he wasn't the Supes from that TPB he was this new more Kryptonian Superman who wasn't married to Lois or even dating her or anything...so then would she really have been crying over him like that? Since they seem to be acting like there isn't anything between Lois and Superman till recent times. What a clusterf*** lol.
Rebirth and such is funny cause that means that Earth has had all six lanterns from Sinstero to Abin Sur to Hal Jordan to John Stewart and Guy Gardner and Kyle Rayner....all within around a five year period. That's a lot of stuff to shove into five years lol.
|
 |
marhawkman
Member
Joined: 10-Oct-2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2926
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 23-Jul-2011 at 12:44am |
sinestro wasn't Abin Sur's succesor. He was always a different sector than Earth. Which only lowers it to 5...
Oh and Supes still has a superbrain.
Edited by marhawkman - 23-Jul-2011 at 12:45am
|
Skrulls rule! Now you can learn to read skrull: http://marhawkman.deviantart.com/gallery/30658027#/d1mujcm
|
 |
Blackcyclops
Member
Joined: 13-Apr-2007
Location: Chi-Town
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7246
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 23-Jul-2011 at 1:52am |
|
|
|
"And someone's mom wants to eat all their souls. As a mom, I was offended. Moms should get to be role models, too."-Savant
|
 |
UncannyScott
Member
Joined: 08-Apr-2007
Location: California
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2700
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 23-Jul-2011 at 7:02am |
|
Yeah realize he wasn't Abin Sur's replacement as that was Hal Jordan, just kept thinking for some reason he was Abin's sector partner or something lol. See DC gets your mind all confused and befuddled just thinking about their continuity.
|
 |
marhawkman
Member
Joined: 10-Oct-2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2926
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 23-Jul-2011 at 4:56pm |
|
they were friends who often helped each other with stuff, but they were in adjoining sectors.
|
Skrulls rule! Now you can learn to read skrull: http://marhawkman.deviantart.com/gallery/30658027#/d1mujcm
|
 |
UncannyScott
Member
Joined: 08-Apr-2007
Location: California
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2700
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 23-Jul-2011 at 8:25pm |
|
Hmm so apparently their taking the sort of lazy way out with past continuity. Asked about the Teen Titans of the past today it was said: "Lobdell promising that the legacy of all the Teen Titans teams over the years will be respected while Johns promised that even though Cyborg is being established as a Justice Leaguer five years in the past, the door is left open at the end of "Justice League's" first arc for him to go join the Titans as chronicled by Wolfman and Perez."
Yesterday or the day before there was mention that Starfire's past with Nightwing won't be erased just not really mentioned. So basically their going to just skirt around if anything is still part of history or not. Yep I'm sure that won't come back to bite them in the ass later on lol. What they need to do is do handbooks like Marvel where they can at least detail out what is staying and what is going and how it will now look. At least that would put some minds at ease. Rather than this "Well maybe it happened...maybe not....we'll see." It's like asking a parent if you can do something.
I think the best way to describe it is like the Spider-Man change just on a grand scale. Events from the past we know might have happened but you have to now imagine that they happened a new way. Instead of Character A being with Character B doing this, it's just Character A cause they didn't meet Character till the future or Character B has been full rebooted so they were never part of the history.
|
 |
RingOtaku
Member
Joined: 17-Apr-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 659
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 23-Jul-2011 at 9:47pm |
|
DC: We Quit Trying
|
|
Alex I do everything like a hawk.
This isn't DC Comics -- Marvel continuity doesn't die out if you don't water it often enough.
The whole Batman idea is a very childish response to childhood trauma.
|
 |
Blackcyclops
Member
Joined: 13-Apr-2007
Location: Chi-Town
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7246
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 23-Jul-2011 at 9:52pm |
|
I think it's worse than OMD...OMD simply said instead of being married Peter and Mary Jane were just a couple. It doesn't change continuity that much...
But this is just strange. I get the whole "let's do a a sliding timeline" thing by compressing time. I mean Marvel does it and it does make things "sticky" but condensing random things into 5 years is kinda insane.
|
|
"And someone's mom wants to eat all their souls. As a mom, I was offended. Moms should get to be role models, too."-Savant
|
 |
EvilMonkeyPope
Member
Joined: 08-Apr-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2491
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 23-Jul-2011 at 10:01pm |
|
This why there shouldn't have been a reboot in the first place. Just new #1s that explain the current staus quo to new readers & a handful of Ultimate titles.
|
 |
UncannyScott
Member
Joined: 08-Apr-2007
Location: California
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2700
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 23-Jul-2011 at 11:28pm |
|
Exactly. They are shooting themselves in the foot here. In typical DC fashion instead of going the easy route they go the complicated route that causes problems that need a reboot once again later on. Just about every single one of the titles they are doing outside the past stuff can be done in the current DC. All of them. Even the past stuff could be done. They could restart all the books with #1 and then still have the first arc of Justice League be the new origin for the team and Action be the new origin for Superman and such while the other books start with a clean fresh #1 and try to respect continuity but not lean on it like a crutch. Perhaps even do a one year later again but do it right and good this time.
The thing Marvel had going for them to do a sliding time scale...they didn't wait till there was 70 something years of stories and then try to condense that many years of events into five little years....so seriously Batman went through four teenage sidekicks that are all just about adults now in that time? The Titans might have existed but maybe not? The marriage was erased and the triangle between Lois and Superman and her new guy is just sort of starting yet the Death story still fits? I think deep down they like being the company with the sh*tty to understand continuity lol.
|
 |
EvilMonkeyPope
Member
Joined: 08-Apr-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2491
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Jul-2011 at 12:15am |
|
No, new JLA and Superman origins should be in Ultimate books not core continuity. Waid already wrote a great retcon origin mini for JLA and there are 3 post-Crisis Superman origins already floating around. Just reprint the trades of those stories. This is just hubris from Johns and Morrison.
|
 |
UncannyScott
Member
Joined: 08-Apr-2007
Location: California
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2700
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Jul-2011 at 1:46am |
|
They'll never stop doing in continuity re-done origins for these characters. Hell they just barely finished the one from Johns what like last year? And now it's all revamped. The only reason they didn't go for full reboot is cause Batman and Green Lantern are cash cows at the moment and Johns and Morrison are guiding those areas and they don't want to lose that. Yet everyone else not involved in the Bat or Lantern lines gets wiped out or totally messed up.
|
 |
The Bub
Member
Joined: 05-Jun-2009
Location: IL
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 459
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Jul-2011 at 8:13pm |
|
Todd's got an interesting take on all this. I suppose it's colored by the fact that he's part of DC's 2nd biggest competitor, but I tend to agree with his take. I'd recommend sticking with this transcript as Todd has a very bizarre way of talking. Most Image employees have their own Todd McFarlane impersonation they work on because of it.
http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=33485
|
|
Donny: Are these the Nazis, Walter?
Walter: No, Donny, these men are nihilists, there's nothing to be afraid of.
|
 |
Blackcyclops
Member
Joined: 13-Apr-2007
Location: Chi-Town
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7246
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Jul-2011 at 8:35pm |
Originally posted by The Bub
Todd's got an interesting take on all this. I suppose it's colored by the fact that he's part of DC's 2nd biggest competitor, but I tend to agree with his take. I'd recommend sticking with this transcript as Todd has a very bizarre way of talking. Most Image employees have their own Todd McFarlane impersonation they work on because of it.
http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=33485 |
Bizarre way of talking LMAO....and you're right LOL
|
|
"And someone's mom wants to eat all their souls. As a mom, I was offended. Moms should get to be role models, too."-Savant
|
 |
grief
Member
Joined: 08-Apr-2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1048
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Jul-2011 at 9:06pm |
|
I dunno, I think Macfarlane's points work fine in regards to the COMIC industry, but that isn't who DC is trying to get the attention of here with this relaunch. Because here's the thing: DC knows that people are going to buy their books. They're DC.
But what DC is trying to accomplish here is to get the attention of EVERYONE ELSE. Announcing a handful of books like Superman or Batman might get the media's attention, but Mainstream America doesn't give a crap about the Flash or Aquaman or the Blackhawks or Birds of Prey. Announcings these books in spurts wouldn't accomplish anything, especially once people know about Superman and Batman - the only two properties that Mainstream cares about. He mentions about holding off on Action or Detective, but really, I don't know ANY non-comic fan who knows those books exist. My gf reads comics and she has no idea what those are - much less how they fit into the "bigger scheme" of Batman/Superman.
I think the big 52 title announcement is a good idea - it gives a clean start to everything, makes one easily rememberable jumping on point, and has a wide variety to choose from.
Besides, who the hell is going to buy all 52? He makes it sound like it's required.
|
|
Winner of Best 617 Hero for 2007 - Magneto (Magneto Cado Rex)
First (and only?) winner of Story of the Month for August 09 - misseDirections #3
|
 |
The Bub
Member
Joined: 05-Jun-2009
Location: IL
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 459
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 25-Jul-2011 at 1:13am |
|
His point is you can entice and possibly woo people to buy new things-you know, most companies in real industries like to see sales GROW-by mixing the obscure with the sure thing and stagger it in a manner that won't daunt people. Maybe I'll try this #1 with my Superman this month, maybe this thing with Batman next month, etc. I thought his action figure line analogy was a great example. If you blow your load in one go, what happens next month when no one in the mainstream media cares? Does a Newsweek article really make people want to look up an LCS? Maybe if they could buy a comic other places, but many parts of this country don't have an LCS that's actually local. DC is about to flood an unhealthy market.
I'm buying Batman because Greg Capullo is drawing it. That seems to be one of the few decisions made by DC that I understand. Did they need to restructure? Yes. But this WB subsidiary hasn't turned a profit in years and doesn't seem to know how. They are kept afloat in hopes of providing fodder for action flicks. Aside from Batman, they haven't really gotten that figured out, either.
|
|
Donny: Are these the Nazis, Walter?
Walter: No, Donny, these men are nihilists, there's nothing to be afraid of.
|
 |
UncannyScott
Member
Joined: 08-Apr-2007
Location: California
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2700
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 25-Jul-2011 at 1:42am |
|
Hmm I suppose DiDio's explanation about Batman having been around longer but just not public known works, just a doesn't fit into their claims that this will be set in more modern times and not seem "golden age" like which many of their comics did even in more modern times. Cause honestly I doubt a grown man in a bat suit could run around nowadays and be just an urban myth or secret lol. That s**t would be on youtube and the news in the blink of an eye if someone blabbed to being taken down by him. Also no one wondered who the heck was taking down these insane people like Joker and Two-FAce all those years before Superman? Out of sight out of mind? lol. The gaps in their continuity and logic aren't really infuriating to me as they are to others it's just hilarious and eye rolling that they can't see it themselves or just don't care enough to go balls out with a full reboot.
I agree going all at once is the best thing to do for what they want to accomplish, this chasing of the mythical new reader. The only downside I forsee for them is if after all the media attention wears off will people actually stick around. Cause like Marvel starting a new series to come out when a character's movie comes out. People are enticed to check out during the time of the movie and maybe a few more issues but, the sales never seem to really stick. Even if things are digital I don't know if that many people that aren't comic fans will actually stick around. Which is funny since non comic fans seem to love comic movies, but not the source material. Opposed to a Harry Potter or Twilight where they devour both. Comics are still seen as "nerdy". I know people that still think that all comic fans are overweight glasses wearing people that live in their mothers basements. The longevity of stereotypes in action.
|
 |
Crawler
Member
Joined: 07-Apr-2007
Location: Indiana
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1333
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 25-Jul-2011 at 1:43am |
|
Can we all pause for a moment for the metaphorical awesomeness of DC "blowing their load" in one go? Because that made my night.
|
|
|
 |
UncannyScott
Member
Joined: 08-Apr-2007
Location: California
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2700
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 25-Jul-2011 at 6:48am |
|
Lol. Someone needs to tell DC they make a pill for that, so you won't blow it all in one go and be done.
|
 |
grief
Member
Joined: 08-Apr-2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1048
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 25-Jul-2011 at 7:49am |
Originally posted by The Bub
His point is you can entice and possibly woo people to buy new things-you know, most companies in real industries like to see sales GROW-by mixing the obscure with the sure thing and stagger it in a manner that won't daunt people. Maybe I'll try this #1 with my Superman this month, maybe this thing with Batman next month, etc. I thought his action figure line analogy was a great example. If you blow your load in one go, what happens next month when no one in the mainstream media cares? Does a Newsweek article really make people want to look up an LCS? Maybe if they could buy a comic other places, but many parts of this country don't have an LCS that's actually local. DC is about to flood an unhealthy market.
|
Well that's where I both agree/disagree. Because honestly, mainstream media DOESN'T care. They wouldn't report on #2's, that's true, but they aren't going to continually report. Again, I don't think that outside of Batman or Superman, Mainstream Media gives a crap. The average FAN might like the staggered release, but again, they're making this as entry-level as possible for New Readers. I also disagree on the flooding part. They were already putting out over 52 books a month. Now they've just cut off the mini-series and added in some more variety. I think, if any, they're putting out less in September than they have in years. I'll agree that the market isn't healthy, but this amount of titles isn't "flooding".
|
|
Winner of Best 617 Hero for 2007 - Magneto (Magneto Cado Rex)
First (and only?) winner of Story of the Month for August 09 - misseDirections #3
|
 |
The Bub
Member
Joined: 05-Jun-2009
Location: IL
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 459
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 25-Jul-2011 at 8:29am |
|
Please explain to me how launching 52 #1 comic books in the same damn month in an effort to encourage new readership isn't flooding. Each and every one of these issues is a marketing gimmick designed to pull new cash in. They are going to cannibalize each other. Do you really think one of your hypothetical new readers is going to grab anything other Batman or Superman's core titles? If by "new reader" you mean "existing comic book purchaser who hasn't collected DC in the past", I'll give you that. But I'm betting John Doe doesn't yellow page his LCS to track down a slew of comics at $4 a clip because of this. I'm not sure anything done in a direct market model is going to grab actual new readers, unless every last person buying those useless tablets is going to drop cake on online comics. I seriously doubt this is the case.
|
|
Donny: Are these the Nazis, Walter?
Walter: No, Donny, these men are nihilists, there's nothing to be afraid of.
|
 |
grief
Member
Joined: 08-Apr-2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1048
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 25-Jul-2011 at 5:27pm |
|
I don't see it as flooding because they're already publishing over 50-some books EVERY month. These are all #1s, yeah, but it's really no different than the amount they usually publish.
I can't argue with the marketing gimmick, cuz yeah, this whole thing is an attempt to make money.
As for the cannibalization: the market is ALREADY cannibalizing itself. Comic sales have only slowly dropped off in the past 20 years. There has been no increase in overall sales. Marvel and DC are just going back and forth, trying to get the same readers to buy the same books.
I think the overall September launch is a good idea because even if that ONE guy does look up a comic shop in order to find the new Batman or Superman, there will be a ton of other BRAND NEW titles on the shelf, ready for him/her to look that. Rather than having Batman 1 and Superman 1, and then Birds of Prey 28 and Outsiders 48, it's ALL #1. Everything is easy to just jump into.
And keep in mind that DC is going to be doing advertising outside of the comic realm. They're going to be running commercials on TV as well as in movie theatres - which at the very least gives them more visibility in the general market.
|
|
Winner of Best 617 Hero for 2007 - Magneto (Magneto Cado Rex)
First (and only?) winner of Story of the Month for August 09 - misseDirections #3
|
 |
Tyler5618
Member
Joined: 05-Jul-2007
Location: New York
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1132
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 27-Jul-2011 at 9:24pm |
|
Did everyone get the free "DC Comics: The New 52" Guide at their LCS today?
I'm not a DC fan at all but I picked it up (because it was free) and I gotta say, the marketing might be working on me. I'm a lot more inclined to pick up JL #1, GL #1, and watch out for titles like Wonder Woman, Teen Titans, and Legion of Superheroes.
And it's cool to see Fabian Nicieza, Scott Lobdell, Judd Winick, DnA, and Paul Cornell getting so much work over there. I wanna see what they're up to.
|
|
"So long as I remain true to myself, I see no reason to apologize for how I appear to others."
- Storm, Uncanny X-Men #246
|
 |
Blackcyclops
Member
Joined: 13-Apr-2007
Location: Chi-Town
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7246
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 27-Jul-2011 at 10:18pm |
|
Interesting that this is a supposed move to a fresh new DC and they're using so many older talent...I mean it's not a complaint but Lobdell is the former X-Men guy, same with Nicieza. Cornell and DnA are "newer" but I mean they really stuck with some older stuff, I guess I would have expected more out there talent or fresh faces.
|
|
"And someone's mom wants to eat all their souls. As a mom, I was offended. Moms should get to be role models, too."-Savant
|
 |
UncannyScott
Member
Joined: 08-Apr-2007
Location: California
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2700
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 28-Jul-2011 at 1:18am |
|
That is the funny part. They are looking for fresh new takes that will speak to the kids of today and then went and gave the books back to people that have been writing for them for years or old school talent that hasn't been part of the big two in years lol. Cornell is newer, but DnA are not so much as they have worked at the two companies off and on since the 90's where they did Legion and Resurrection Man stuff for DC before. It'd be like saying you want fresh and new and hiring Claremont :p. It will be interesting to see if they can make things 'fresh & new' and not fall back into trappings. Cause according to DiDio they have 5 years of this planned out now and there will be no events for quite some time. Many are skeptical that will last, and sadly I agree cause Marvel has a big X-Event and Marvel Universe event planned for next year they've been hinting at and when money rolls in for that I'm sure DC is gonna have to think of something cause by then the titles won't be so 'fresh' anymore as they'll be getting close to double digit numbers.
Someone should tell them they need to jump on the Handbook bandwagon. Marvel has made money off them. Even the Walking Dead now has one. Invincible has one too I think. Powers got one too. Be the perfect way for us to see the history of the new DCU without them having to show it all in the books since they are against that idea.
|
 |