| Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Atma
Member
Joined: 18-May-2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 17
|
Quote Reply
Topic: Psylocke in the Age of X Posted: 02-Jun-2011 at 3:26pm |
|
I read that Carey confirmed Psylocke was in the Age of X. I thought that she was supposed to be immune to any sort of reality manipulation via her brother, Jamie Braddock. Or did she lose this after the body switch back-and-forth? Anyone have any clarification?
|
|
|
 |
marhawkman
Member
Joined: 10-Oct-2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2942
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-Jun-2011 at 4:40pm |
|
This was apprently undone when she was in Exiles. Or maybe when Spiral di yet another body swap.
|
Skrulls rule! Now you can learn to read skrull: http://marhawkman.deviantart.com/gallery/30658027#/d1mujcm
|
 |
Drunk
Member
Joined: 08-Jul-2007
Location: Kentucky
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 169
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-Jun-2011 at 7:05pm |
|
I think it happened when the Sisterhood brought her back. There was nothing in her Exiles run that suggested she lost it.
|
|
I've got a theory, It could be Bunnies - Anya (Buffy the Vampire Slayer)
|
 |
medium13
Limbo moderator
Joined: 09-Apr-2007
Location: New York
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 731
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 03-Jun-2011 at 2:01am |
|
It's been somewhat unclear since her return. Carey wrote Psylocke as susceptible to reality warping when she faced off against Proteus during Necrosha. I think it is worth noting that even Claremont, who developed the idea that Betsy would be immune from reality warps, mind control, and possession applied these rules inconsistently.
Edit: But in general I think the Sisterhood arc is a good 'line' to be drawn in the sand, although it doesn't address it textually either.
Edited by medium13 - 03-Jun-2011 at 2:04am
|
 |
Ciel
Member
Joined: 12-May-2007
Location: Lexington, SC
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1265
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 03-Jun-2011 at 2:09am |
|
In other words, she's immune to reality manipulation but not reality manipulation.
|
 |
RingOtaku
Member
Joined: 17-Apr-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 662
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 03-Jun-2011 at 3:54pm |
|
Well given that was all done by Jamie to protect her from that big evil who may or may not be Lucifer in the Foursaken arc, isn't it possible that after that battle and Jamie being left behind to use all his power to hold Big Baddy at bay that she lost the powers then?
|
|
Alex I do everything like a hawk.
This isn't DC Comics -- Marvel continuity doesn't die out if you don't water it often enough.
The whole Batman idea is a very childish response to childhood trauma.
|
 |
marhawkman
Member
Joined: 10-Oct-2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2942
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 03-Jun-2011 at 6:10pm |
|
That does seem possible. It was never made clear how permanent it was supposed to be. Maybe it was going to wear off anyways?
|
Skrulls rule! Now you can learn to read skrull: http://marhawkman.deviantart.com/gallery/30658027#/d1mujcm
|
 |
Atma
Member
Joined: 18-May-2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 17
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 03-Jun-2011 at 7:08pm |
|
Maybe it's like Roma giving the X-Men invisibility to cameras: he just got busy and forgot about it.
|
 |
Tyler5618
Member
Joined: 05-Jul-2007
Location: New York
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1132
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 03-Jun-2011 at 7:13pm |
|
I was just going to use the Roma/Siege Perilous analogy as a precedent.
After going through the SP, they lost their technological "invisibility" so I'm going to guess the same thing happened to Psylocke again after the latest body swaps during Sisterhood.
|
|
"So long as I remain true to myself, I see no reason to apologize for how I appear to others."
- Storm, Uncanny X-Men #246
|
 |
Kipe
Member
Quireclops
Joined: 08-Apr-2007
Location: Kansas City, MO
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1641
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 03-Jun-2011 at 8:05pm |
|
It would make sense. I don't know if Jamie brought her back in her corpse and rewired it or if he just created a new body from scratch for her. Either way, she's no longer in that body now right?
|
 |
marhawkman
Member
Joined: 10-Oct-2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2942
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 04-Jun-2011 at 12:07am |
|
Correct.
|
Skrulls rule! Now you can learn to read skrull: http://marhawkman.deviantart.com/gallery/30658027#/d1mujcm
|
 |